Maybe in a soon future, we'll see the popular "Cyber Love Spell"? Art: Cyber Girl Artist:Ayya Saparniyazova - Turkmenistan |
Cybermagick Need Intent
29/05/2016
Alex Sumner
in a recent article commented about Cybermagick: Let’s Do Cyber!
So there I was, lying
awake at night, tortured by that most exquisite of agonies – “what the hell is Cybermagick?” And more to the
point, what is the real difference between cybermagick and any other type of
magick?
It’s a very
interesting work, and I will try to do some adding my comments.
We still
lack of a proper definition of what Cybermagick really means.
Technomagick?
EletronicMagick?
Uhm.
Cyber means
something “…relating to, or involving computers or computer networks (as the
Internet)…” Source: The Merriam Webster Dictionary.
So for now, I will follow with my personal idea:
“Cybermagick as related to using computers to
do magic(k)”.
See this is
in no ways related to the many magick areas nor religions practices, Grimoires,
CM, Witchcraft, Chaos, ATRs, Candles, etc.
I think
Cybermagick still is a bit far to become more than an idea to start for some
usefull developments.
Art: The Matrix by Daniel Prichard -Canada |
And shit,
please, we got bored at the most extreme point about newbies promoting debates
about Matrix idea. Go back to Narnia and Harry Potter and 1001 Nights. That
still is more advanced! IMHO for sure.
Forget the
high velocity of modern computers, which still are the same very basic systems
used first in the past to control textile machinery. Just faster. I’m very serious
about this. Go study.
I have
worked developing software since the 70s and in magic/spiritual study and
practice near same time. Therefore, I use to say I have a personal interest in
the Human X Computer development and is interesting how many a company and
human kind is related to that.
In addition,
we are faraway of what the Star Trek's computer was able to do, like to process
an entire solar system data in seconds and present information like "that
are a planet M-class with current civilization level". But think for a
second and that still is just a machine processing data. Yes, even Star Trek
computer does not do magick, and even with our beloved Mr. Spock with all his Vulcan
Mind Power capabilities working on it. Just to remember, Vulcans was great at
mind control, a kind of magick too in someway.
So, as
cited, what the difference for the Akashic Records? My personal experience
going there is: the Akasha Records register everything, at all areas and
realms. For some people, myself included, entering there appears you have
entered in a kind of fog place, with partial symbols floating everywhere. This
is why is good to have a target to go there, and this is the "key" to
find what you want. Sometime one of that symbols may appear more clear and you
"get it", like a door and enter in a complete scenario. Time, events,
people, thoughts, everything is registered there. You may see events and be
able to get the thoughts of each people there.
Art: Parabolic Vehicle ofConception by Adam Scott Miller - United States |
Computers
are really far away from this.
Even the
images you see at your computer screen are not the same as a drawing done with
pencil and paper. This is why many people try to put seals in their computers
and that works different. When it works.
In
practice, what is working there is mind and the magician intent. Not the
computer. It’s the same to visualize a seal image, but without a drawing. The
computer image in no ways can be seen as a valid drawn today. It may help you
to remember how the image is, but it is not the true drawn seal.
In my
personal opinion, this happens because the draw at the paper have already your
intent registered. It became a tool used with energy to register the
information of an intent! To magick, your pencil is a more powerful tool than
any tablet.
But the
computer image, even if you put your own energy and have done it using some
kind of paint software, still is a mess of 0s and 1s. To have a better idea, just
look closer the screen, better if you use a magnifying glass. You will see the
same at a TV screen: a lot of light dots. That is not a draw in the magic(k) point
of view! Its just a lot of electric points.
Get this?
You can see an image at the computer, but that still is not information.
So, sorry
to my university teachers and IT colleagues, it is not really information. That
data is something that "appears to be" information.
But to
magickal use, information must be a whole think by itself.
This is
what Cybermagick will last to happens for a time. I have my ideas about what
human kind need to learn before reach that. For example, our civilization technology
started with the wheel and the levers. Even software still use such concepts. That
is the problem. This may evolve to the next level. But let’s keep so for now.
As I see,
what we have working today, using “cyber technology” and there are some good
examples, are one and other good oracle software and websites. But what really
work there? The intent of the reader. Get this? A bad reader with the best of
all oracle tools will not get a decent result. So, there are no cyber way to do
the same.
What is
really acting is the intent of the reader, his expertise and capability to deal
with the tools used.
And intent
is just the main power behind magick.
Magicians
learn about working with "The Will". AC and others in modern times just made the word
more popular.
Ok, there
are already many works about but I like the idea. The problem is a lot of stupid
people think “do your will” means the same as “do whatever you think”.
So think on
this: you only have rights
when you recognizes that others also have rights. So your “Will” start
in the point where you recognize others also have a Will (even if unused).
Using your
Will means you must be the true owner of your intent. But what most happens is
people who are ruled by politics, religions, prejudices, partial personal
opinions, society, etc. They are not using their Will. They are acting like
parrots. A drugs addicted is ruled by the drugs. Religion can be a drug,
politics is a drug, etc. It is not you, it is someone else point of view. This
is the difference.
Ok, let us
keep in the “intent”. This is the needed to work on magick. Have an intent and
be able to work with it for some time. This is why so many stupid people are
able to make the “evil eye”, and do it often. A very negative thing for sure.
They may be stupid, but still be able to fix an intent for the needed time over
a target.
If the
current technology is not able to even register “information” in a more decent
aspect, not just data, why expect it will be able to “act” or even simulate
intent?
Art: Rainforest Residence by Matthew Attard - Australia |
But crystals,
for example, use another methods and currently also need personal development
to be able to connect and understand the information the crystal can register
and process someway accordingly with the specific qualities each one may have.
Sorry newagers, forgot the fantasy aspects even if that are always good to make
movies and fairie tales. This is a technology still faraway of most scientist’s
research. Well, I’m sure some may be trying to understand about psychometry, is
a starting point. But again related to “whole information” idea.
And
psychometry ideas and methods can be one of many ways to develop in the future
a working Cybermagick.
The
capability to a computer (with its software) to connect with the whole
information related to some event.
This is the
point when we will see something really new start: connect to information and
be able to deal with it.
However, remember,
as commented, magick is based on “intent”. And how you learned and develop to
made it.
To finish, in my point of view, Cybermagick will become true when such mechanisms become able to “make and act” on an intent using “whole information”. Not just the current mess of 0s and 1s, but whole information under an intent.
Easy to
think a clay done Golem or Thralls are still more advanced in the aspect of “act”.
The problem is how they work with the information they receive, and here become
another point, how to ask or command, reasoning and etc. Uhm, remember HAL 9000
from the 2001 A Space Odissey?
P+
.'.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário